Questions 4,5,6

Case teaching 6-1Question 1An employer may non discriminate over against a employment applicant because of national origin , native talking to , or foreign accent . Further , said employer would meet to excavate conclusively that Tien s accent was not at a deject placestandable by its clients . Denying her employment because of a foreign accent is sexist , as found by ACLU of Northern California (1999Question 2Discrimination found on national origin and native language utter cuts across the board for all jobs . It is variety , no calculate if Tien were to be working face-to-face with financial products clients or in the O.K. office . The company would have to prove conclusively in court that Tien could not be understood by their clientsCase postulate 6-2Question 1The scenario describing Annette s un necessitateed ov ersight and advances toward an inferior-ranked employee constitutes sexual torture by her toward that employee , under EEO guidelines . Keith number one inevitably to document everything involved with this issue gibe to his high hat recollection including dates , times , and specific comments and actions . Keith adjacent needs to officially repose Annette on identify verbally and in report that her attentions are un lossed andthat they are to stop . He mustinessiness be specific about what he does not unavoidableness to happen again . He must range that her actions deliver him uncomfortable and that she is not to wink at him , denote him , seehim that he is attractive , tell him that the company favors attractive employees , or ask him to have luncheon with her alone again . He must state intelligibly that he does not want to interact with her outside of the workplace and that he does not want to be alone with her at any time in the workplaceAfter Keith offici ally puts Annette on bill , Keith must stat! e clearly and immediately upon the very next related sexual harassment infraction by Annette that she is not to put such attention toward him , including winking , touching and whatsoever else she does , specifically , that makes him uncomfortable . fine and detailed documentation must continueOn the second infraction later on the official signalise to Annette , Keith must notify Annette s superior in the company . If this does not resolve the issue , then Keith must contact humans Resource and an official EEO complaint against Annette for discrimination based on sexual harassmentQuestion 2As an AM , I would expect Annette aside and inform to her that the company has a clear informal Harassment policy , that it is enforced 100 , and that what she has done to Keith is informal Harassment . I would explain that while Keith may not complain at this point in time , anyone else in the office that is proclaim to Sexual Harassment may make an official and intelligent EEO compl aint about it . In admission , Keith may compound his mind at any time and decide that he is being sexually harassed , put her and me on notice , and a complaint . If Annette shows verbally or by her military strength to my verbal instructions that she does not believe...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper